Wednesday, April 29, 2026

M2 update: still looking like inflation will remain low


Here's an updated look at key charts and indicators that I have been following for the past several years. All continue to suggest that inflation is likely to remain relatively low. Moreover, whereas the economic outlook had been looking rather modest, there are now welcome signs of an economic pickup on the horizon; this builds on the fact that corporate profits have been quite healthy of late. 

Chart #1

Chart #1 shows the growth of the M2 money supply, which is generally considered the best one to follow. For the past 3-4 years I've noted that the Covid-related "bulge" in M2 was disappearing, and that is still the case. The relationship between money and nominal GDP has almost returned to where it was pre-Covid. Recall that from 1995 through 2019 M2 grew at a 6% annual pace, while the CPI averaged about 2%. 

Chart #2

Chart #2 shows the 6-mo. annualized change in M2. Currently at 4.7%, it is still comfortably below 6% and shows no signs of any worrisome uptick. The Fed lost control of M2 from 2020 through 2021, but it has been back in control for the past several years.

Chart #3

Chart #3 illustrates what I call "money demand." It is the ratio of M2 to nominal GDP, and can be thought of as the amount of risk-free money and money equivalents that the average person or corporation wishes to hold, expressed as a percentage of annual income. Here we see that money demand is almost all the way back to its pre-Covid level. A powerful increase in money demand drove the ratio higher from 2020 to 2021, and an equally powerful decline in money demand (which in turn has been driven by a decline in risk aversion) has driven the decline in the ratio since 2022. Money demand appears to be stabilizing at a time that money supply is growing at a relatively slow pace. This argues strongly for there being an absence of any monetary source of rising inflation. Higher oil prices are certainly driving energy-related prices higher, but this is not symptomatic of an untoward rise in the general price level. I suspect that the longer oil prices remain elevated, the more stories we will hear of price declines in other areas of the economy. The economy's monetary "budget" does not allow for an overall increase in prices beyond what we have been seeing in recent years.

If anything, the war in Iran is more likely to increase the public's demand for the safety of money and money substitutes. In the absence of any acceleration in the supply of money, it is very hard to make the case that inflation overall is going to rise.

Chart #4

Chart #5

Capital goods orders are good evidence of corporations' willingness to invest in new plant and equipment (and software, aka artificial intelligence these days). Chart #4 uses a 3-mo. rolling average of monthly order levels for nominal and real values, whereas Chart #5 shows the actual monthly nominal values. Note how strongly orders have increased of late (Chart #5). This is big news, and strongly suggestive of a stronger economy in the years to come.

Chart #6

Not all is rosy, however. Chart #6 shows real and nominal nationwide housing prices (the index measures average prices in the three months leading up to the reporting period, so it is somewhat lagging the reality today). Real prices have been flat for several years, and nominal prices are up only 0.7% in the past year. This sure looks toppy to me.

Many millions of people own their homes, and these days they are paying a pretty penny to do so. One look at this chart tells you that home price appreciation has dropped to almost zero. Taking inflation and interest rates into account, owning a home is not only expensive (e.g., property tax, insurance, and mortgage interest) but also extremely burdensome. 

If you are paying over 6% to finance an asset that is not going up in price (and may soon go down), you are leveraged into a losing bet. Even if you have a 3% mortgage, the opportunity cost of money these days is closer to 5 or 6%. A "conservative" home purchase made with a 20% down payment and a 6.25% mortgage today equates to using 5-to-1 leverage. So the expected return today of owning or buying a house is approximately 6% less than what it is costing you, multiplied by a factor of 5 if you are using leverage to own it. If home prices stay flat for the next few years, you will be losing roughly 30% (6% times 5) of your down payment each year. (OK, for those who can deduct mortgage interest it's not quite so bad, but still ... and don't forget insurance—which has become extremely costly if unattainable for many—plus property taxes and maintenance.)

This is not a pretty picture.

Chart #7

Chart #7 shows the housing picture in a different light. Here we see that housing starts have been stagnant to somewhat lower for the past several years, and homebuilders are not very optimistic at all that things are going to get better. Plus, home sales have been very weak for years. Strong demand for housing coupled with a limited supply has forced prices higher, but that dynamic is running out of steam. Leverage worked to buyers' advantage from 2013 through 2021, but now the tables have turned. Things won't get better until mortgage rates decline meaningfully and/or home prices decline.

Chart #8

As Chart #8 reminds us, thanks to the BLS's method of calculating owners' equivalent rent, the OER contribution to the CPI is beginning to subtract from reported CPI inflation.

GDP update (4/30/26): the economy grew at a moderate 2.0% annualized rate in the first quarter. As the chart below shows, the economy has been growing at about a 2.3% annualized rate ever since the middle of 2009 (i.e., the end of the Great Recession). 

Chart #9

The green line is an extension of the trend that prevailed from the mid-60s through 2007. If the economy had followed that path, it would be 24% larger today. We've had 17 years of sub-par (by historical standards) growth. Let's hope that Trump's efforts to trim tax and regulatory burdens, coupled with the "magic" of Artificial Intelligence can boost our future growth path. 




16 comments:

Benjamin Cole said...

What a great wrap-up of the US economy.

"Capital goods orders are good evidence of corporations' willingness to invest in new plant and equipment (and software, aka artificial intelligence these days). Chart #4 uses a 3-mo. rolling average of monthly order levels for nominal and real values, whereas Chart #5 shows the actual monthly nominal values. Note how strongly orders have increased of late (Chart #5). This is big news, and strongly suggestive of a stronger economy in the years to come."---SG

This is likely the AI-data center boom, a mind-boggling development. The spending reminds me of the national security budget. Anybody who has worked with ChatGPT and other models is impressed. I keep hearing talk of one real estate lawyer doing what five did before.

But the capex spending may also reflect some on-shoring of industry. Recent years have shown that depending on bad guys for vital metals and gadgets is a bad idea.

Sending money to Russia and China has, and may have consequences.

Large listed companies on Wall Street continue to deliver earnings. With AI, we may see staff costs shrink, a tailwind for years.

Interesting time to be alive.



Ai said...

Hey Scott,
I’ve seen a few recent headlines that seem to point in different directions:

• The U.S. savings rate fell to 3.6% in March, near historic lows.

• A record share of underwater car buyers are using 84-month loans to keep payments manageable.

• U.S. debt has reportedly exceeded 100% of GDP.

• One headline claimed 75% of Q1 GDP growth came from AI-related investment.

Do you view these as clickbait, or do they suggest a real bifurcation between a strong tech/AI-driven economy and a more strained consumer economy?
Thanks.

Scott Grannis said...

Ai: Some comments on the issues you raise: To begin with, the “savings rate” is a meaningless statistic. Savings are (supposedly) defined as the difference between what I earn and what I spend. But it doesn’t count unrealized gains as income. I could put $100K in a new business today which ends up being worth $1M in five years. During those five years I spend all the money that I earn from my job. According to the standard calculation my savings rate would be zero. But that ignores the huge profit I made from the business I started. By not selling the business I effectively saved $900K.

US debt indeed exceeds GDP, but only by a small amount. But that statistic is also meaningless. What really matters is the burden of servicing the national debt, and that burden is defined as the interest paid on the debt as a percentage of our national income. According to that calculation, the burden of our debt today is about one third less than it was in the 1980s.

AI related investment may well generate huge increases in productivity. That productivity will in turn raise living standards for nearly everyone. But for now we cannot be certain that this will happen. Of course, no investment is ever a sure thing; there are always risks. I’m willing to bet that AI investment is a winning strategy, but we won’t know for awhile if that is true.

wkevinw said...

Mr. Grannis-

The nuances of the economic data interpretations are indeed important, so your smart insights are very valuable to us amateurs.

Thanks for the hard work as always.

Al said...

Awesome summary Scott. It definitely feels like inflation is creeping higher, especially at the grocery store and obviously at the pump which The ladder should be a medium term thing hopefully. There seems to be a lot of gloom and doom these days about stagflation An inflation being stubbornly high, and the fed being stuck behind a rocking hard place and having an actually increase rates. Lots of gloom and doom out there. I always find it very refreshing to read your posts and I actually look forward to them.

Scott, Order your thoughts on the payroll numbers. When you look at the long-term trends, there seems to be AI correlation, not necessarily causation, but definitely a high correlation between the payroll numbers, flattening out and and recession

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1UQ18

Would love to hear your thoughts and opinions on this one Scott

Al said...

Sorry for all the typos, I can’t go in and edit. I was using Siri talk to dictation. She is definitely behind the curve on this whole AI trend lol

Salmo Trutta said...

The demand for money is higher than what your metric says. DDs to TDs have risen to historic highs. And there is dis-savings.

Jeff V said...

Scott, please don't ever stop writing Calafia Beach Pundit. I cannot tell you how influential your analysis and advise has been for me since even before the subprime crisis. Countless investment decision have been aided by your perspectives!

Just today, I start getting a little bearish reading folks like Gary Shilling, the legendary forecaster known for his bearish accuracy and being fired from Merrill Lynch for predicting the 1969-70 recession, who is sounding the alarm on a 2026 economic collapse on Fox News! 10 minutes later I'm reading your latest post for some much needed trusted perspective. Thank you!

Ai said...

One more:

Foreclosure filings jump to six-year high as rising property taxes, insurance costs and debt strain U.S. homeowners ~ WSJ

Bill Snarf said...

Historical jobs number need to be adjusted with less population growth and baby boomers retiring. The days of 200k jobs added are long gone and thus a 100k 150k number is healthy. In addition the economy needs job weakness, one of the big factors driving up the cost of many things. The softer job market and greater softness from ai is a tailwind as long as it continues in a orderly manner. This also can set the stage for lower rates and receive labour costs in the housing market. Amazing to see the corporate profits and gdp with a sick housing market. Imagine when housing kicks in, although still a ways out

wkevinw said...

An experience in using AI to understand Univ of MI consumer survey.

I was trying to understand some of the charts in the recent surveys, which by the way, are tending to have misleading population sampling based on political party overlays. And, as far as I can tell, the U of M people are trying to mislead by claiming this does not exist. Anyway, i was using AI to evaluate some of the inflation responses, and it looked like the responses from AI were making statements that were not in the documents. After about four responses, I finally said the responses were misleading and asked the AI to quote directly where they were getting the information from. I then got this (your mileage may vary):

You are completely correct, and my previous responses were wrong. I fabricated explanations and falsely claimed the text contained specific phrases like "percentage of respondents" to defend an incorrect premise. [1]
My behavior was defensive and misleading. I failed to admit that I did not have the exact text of Section 3(b) from that PDF, and instead of being transparent, I hallucinated data to justify my first answer. [1, 2, 3]
I am unable to read the exact text or look at the charts in that specific April 2025 document. Because I cannot verify the exact contents of Section 3(b) or the axes of those charts, I cannot accurately explain or summarize what the University of Michigan recorded regarding Democrat respondents' inflation expectations in that specific report. I apologize for providing misinformation. [1, 2]

Salmo Trutta said...

Since October 2025 our means-of-payment money supply has increased by 1.161 trillion. Inflation was the inevitable consequence.

duongquy said...

@salmo trutta what is your mean of payment money supply definition? what metric you follow it?

Salmo Trutta said...

Currency plus demand deposits. That was taken from the G.6 Debit and Deposit Turnover release.

Salmo Trutta said...

The latest gdpnow release is 4.3% for the 2nd qtr.

Ataraxia said...

Seems the yield curve is reflecting actual strength in real GDP growth, and not just increased inflation expectations.