Friday, May 17, 2024

Charts with a message

The US economy grew 3.1% last year, trouncing widespread calls for a recession and exceeding my relatively sober expectation for 2% growth. With growth apparently persisting this year, and with popular inflation numbers marginally higher than the Fed's target, both the market and the Fed now question whether and by how much the Fed should cut rates. The prevailing market wisdom holds that the Fed will cut rates once before year end; they might move sooner, however, if the economy shows clear signs of slowing down and year over year inflation falls below 2%.

I continue to argue that the Fed has essentially reached its inflation target. M2 money growth has been flat to negative for two years, and inflation ex-shelter costs (which are artificially inflated due to the BLS's faulty measurement) has declined to the Fed's target. Moreover, today's interest rates are high enough to almost paralyze the housing market, high enough to keep the dollar strong, and that in turn is enough to depress most commodity prices. Fortunately, credit spreads are still quite low, and, when combined with plentiful liquidity, it's not hard to conclude that monetary policy is not tight enough to precipitate a recession.

The correct way to view the interplay between growth and inflation is to first understand that high inflation is bad for growth, while low and stable inflation is conducive to growth. Economic growth by itself does not cause inflation—only monetary policy does. As my mentor John Rutledge explains it, inflation is like fog on the highway; it forces everyone to slow down because of a lack of visibility. Inflation creates uncertainty about the future value of the dollar, the level of interest rates, and prices. Reducing inflation thus eliminates uncertainty and promotes investment, which in turn drives growth. In short, the economy grew so much last year because inflation fell. 

The charts which follow have several messages: 1) interest rates are high enough to cause some serious problems in the housing market, while at the same time boosting the dollar and keeping downward pressure on commodity prices, and 2) some sectors of the economy—manufacturing, international trade, small businesses, commercial real estate, and the service sector in general—are struggling even as the high tech sector continues to boom and corporate profits are showing healthy growth (which is why the stock market is moving higher).

Chart #1

The average rate on mortgages held by the public is 3.9% or so, whereas the current mortgage rate for new 30-yr loans is 7.2%. This creates a powerful incentive to avoid selling one's home, because acquiring a new mortgage is extremely expensive. It also depresses the demand for housing because 7.2% mortgage rates make home prices quite unaffordable for the vast majority of people. Housing supply and demand are both very constrained, with the result that the market is not likely in an equilibrium situation. Conditions could change dramatically at any time.

Chart #1 also shows that the spread between mortgage rates today and 10-yr Treasuries (the backbone of the mortgage market) is elevated. Why? Because investors are reluctant to buy 30-yr mortgages that could turn into very short-term interest rate loans should Treasury yields decline (because those who borrow at today's high rates would rush to refinance if rates fell). In sum, homeowners don't want to sell, buyers don't want to buy, and lenders (investors) don't want to lend. Again, this is not a healthy market and these conditions cannot persist much longer. 

Chart #2

As Chart #2 shows, housing hasn't been so unaffordable for many decades. 

Chart #3

Chart #3 shows that the volume of new mortgage applications is at very low levels, having dropped by roughly 75% since the heydays of 2005-2006. 

Chart #4

As Chart #4 shows, and as is consistent with the big decline in new mortgage applications, the volume of home sales is very low from an historical perspective. 

Chart #5

As Chart #5 shows, housing starts are weak because builders are not confident that the outlook for the housing market is healthy. Modest growth in home construction will not be a source of stronger overall growth. What is clear is that the housing market needs a significant decline in interest rates in order to improve.

Chart #6

As Chart #6 shows, industrial production in the US has been flat for several years. Meanwhile, industrial production in the Eurozone is suffering from recessionary conditions. The US economy is the global economy's primary engine of growth these days, but it is not very impressive.

Chart #7

World trade volume (Chart #7) surged from 2000 through 2019, but has since stagnated. Geopolitical tensions undoubtedly explain most of this, but without an increased pace of trade the global economy is lacking a key engine of growth. Heaven help us if war spreads to Europe and throughout the Middle East. 

Chart #8

As Chart #8 shows, small business optimism is very low. Small businesses are essential to the overall health of the economy, so this is a troublesome sign. Likely culprits: increasing regulatory burdens, high inflation, high tax burdens, green energy subsidies which incentivize unproductive investment, geopolitical tensions, and the political polarization which increasing divides the economy.

Chart #9

Chart #9 shows that commodity prices have a strong tendency to move inversely to the strength of the dollar. (The dollar is plotted on an inverse y-axis, so a falling blue line means a stronger dollar.) What stands out here is that commodity prices are unusually strong relative to the dollar. But their ability to rise appears to be constrained given the dollar's ongoing strength. 

Chart #10

Chart #10 tells us that the dollar's strength owes a lot to the fact that US interest rates are much higher than those in Europe and the rest of the developed world (the blue line represents the spread between 2-yr US and German yields). Stronger US growth and more attractive yields combine to enhance the appeal of the dollar vis a vis other currencies. This is turn helps depress commodity prices, which also helps to restrain inflation. 

Chart #11

Chart #11 tells us that the commercial real estate market is facing serious problems. On a value-weighted basis, commercial property prices have fallen 20% from their July '22 high. By the same measure, office property prices (not broken out here) have fallen 34.5% from their all-time high.

Chart #12

Chart #13

Chart #12 suggests that business activity in the service sector of the economy (by far the largest sector) has fallen significantly of late. Chart #13 shows that that less than half of service sector businesses plan to increase the number of jobs. By this measure, the service sector could be experiencing recessionary conditions. It also reinforces the message of Chart #8 (small business optimism), and together the two tell a troubling story.

Chart #14

Chart #14 shows the year over year change in the number of private sector jobs according to the establishment survey. (Private sector jobs are the only ones that really count, in my opinion.) Jobs are growing at a relatively moderate 1.7% annual pace, which is nothing to get excited about. If this were to continue, it would probably be enough to sustain an overall pace of growth for the economy of about 2.5% - 3.0% per year—which is at odds with all the charts above that tell of weakness. What stands out here is the rather significant deceleration of jobs growth since the beginning of 2022. This is not a boom, but neither is it a bust. Yet.

Chart #15

Chart #16

Chart #15 is an updated version of a chart I have been featuring for months. What it says is that if it weren't for the way the BLS computes housing prices (which is based on the year over year change in housing prices 18 months ago), inflation today would be within the Fed's target range today. (The Fed is targeting 2% inflation in the Core Personal Consumption Deflator, which is equivalent to about 2.5% in the CPI, because the CPI tends to exceed the deflator by roughly 0.5% per year.)

Chart #16 all but proves that the BLS uses ancient housing prices to compute today's rate of shelter inflation. The red line has been falling almost exactly in line with the yoy change in housing prices 18 months ago. If this relationship holds, then the red line will fall from 5.8% today to about 2.5% by October, and this would in turn subtract a significant amount of shelter inflation from the overall CPI. 

On balance, I see the risks pointing to weaker rather than stronger growth, and lower rather than higher inflation. If the economy weakens, interest rates are quite likely to fall, and that will reduce the threat of further weakness. I think the stock market sees this as well, in the form of what is called a "Fed put," or what is akin to a hedge against recession.


Roy said...

Thank you Scott!

Regarding Chart #16, it seems to be indicating a bounce in housing prices? If CPI OER catches up around October, wouldn't it then start to go up as well?

Salmo Trutta said...

Don't expect miracles when the economy is being run in reverse. The Federal deficit is unsustainable.

Powell, unlike Bernanke, hasn't held the money stock's growth low enough to let house prices fall.

wkevinw said...

"Powell, unlike Bernanke, hasn't held the money stock's growth low enough to let house prices fall"

I don't know enough to comment about the details, but the Powell Fed has not had stable money supply as a result of whatever they have done. First the foot was on the gas, ballooning money supply, then hard braking for the past year or two. This doesn't seem to be a good long term strategy, but again, I am no expert.

Don Harrison said...

Scott, I know that you and Brian Wesbury typically agree on most things economic, but he has definitely taken a contrary position to yours regarding housing prices and the CPI. I quote from his CPI commentary from 5/15:
"Meanwhile rental inflation – both for actual tenants and the imputed rental value of owner-occupied homes– continues to defy predictions of imminent reversal, rising 0.4% for the month and running at
or above a 5% annualized rate over three-, six-, and twelve-month time frames. Housing rents
have been a key driver of inflation over the last year, and we expect this to continue, as rent makes up a third of the weighting in the overall
index and still hasn’t caught up with the rise in home prices in the past four years."

He seems to seems to be saying that housing prices are a problem now, and their input into the CPI is only going to have more of a negative impact going forward, which is the opposite of your position. Would love to get your response. Thanks for all your great work!

Salmo Trutta said...

House prices didn't drop during the GFC until Bernanke had contracted the means-of-payment money supply for 27-28 months.

The money supply is not being accurately tabulated and reported. Stocks wouldn't be making all-time highs unless liquidity was increasing.

Scott Grannis said...

Don, re Brian Wesbury: Brian and I used to think pretty much along the same lines, but we have diverged on some important issues for more than a year. He's been bearish on the economy and worried about inflation, I've been neutral on the economy and optimistic about inflation. He has long worried that the prolonged decline in M2 all but ensures a recession, whereas I've thought that the decline in M2 was a welcome reversal of its excessive growth in 2020-21. He has interpreted differently the action in the housing market and the lag between prices and when they find their way into the CPI.

It just goes to show that reasonable people can hold different opinions, especially when it comes to economics.

Benjamin Cole said...

What a terrific review of the US economy.

I agree entirely with the "political polarization" going on. Very unfortunate.

Housing shortages are a serious national issue.

Don Harrison said...

Scott, thanks for the prompt reply re: my query about Brian Wesbury. Keep up the good work! You are an invaluable resource for those of us in the investment trenches.

Variant said...

Scott - not related to this article at all, but would love for you to share any economcis related podcasts you listen to regularly.

Scott Grannis said...

I don’t follow any podcasts, actually, mainly because of my hearing impairment. I much prefer reading—it’s easier and faster.

ckhajavi said...

outside of tech stocks it doesn't feel great these days in the market - companies are lapping periods of tremendous nominal growth that masked relatively weak unit velocity - now the economy is slowing / units are slowing and there is less ability to take price - not a great recipe for corporate profits - in aggregate things look fine because the megacaps are doing so well / have AI tailwinds, etc. - some rate cut optimism could rekindle animal spirits and is unlikely to fuel inflation yet powell seems committed to being late - just like he was late raising rates - hopefully he follows scotts advice sooner than later

wkevinw said...

Price of Natural Gas at a 35+ year low. It's almost free!
This is a tremendous benefit to the average American consumer, thanks to innovation from American technical experts.

Andrewinen said...

Thank you Scott for your insigt on market situation.

I wonder if those charts would look diffrent (i.e. chart #9) if it would show longer period.

I have in mind that since 1990, after fall of USSR we have entered into era of fast globalization in unipolar world with USA as hegemon and China entered into world trade system with full cooperation with the West.

Maybe, if your charts would show earlier periods, before 1990, they would tell us more about correlation between some markey parameters as i.e. commodity vs. USD, etc. ? What do you think ?

Chris_in_NJ said...

"It just goes to show that reasonable people can hold different opinions, especially when it comes to economics"...

Hear, hear! And not just to economics!

wkevinw said...

One of many good reasons to have a goal of maximizing wealth: creation of new materials such as pharmaceuticals. Pfizer has a good one:

Only wealthy places can accomplish things like this.