Friday, October 7, 2022

Inflation visualized


Before leaving for Argentina a few weeks ago, I arranged with Western Union to pick up $2000 worth of Argentine pesos at the "blue" rate of 300 pesos to the dollar.

I knew in advance that I was getting a great exchange rate and that things would be very cheap in Argentina, and I wasn't wrong. What I didn't know was that the largest bill in circulation is a 1000 peso note. Which meant that my $2000 would become 600,000 pesos, in the form of 600 1000-peso notes. It took the cashier at a local Western Union kiosk about 10 minutes to organize and count the bills. The photo says it all: 6 bundles of 100 notes, each bundle worth $333.33; each note worth $3.33. I needed a bag to carry all that money back to our hotel.




It took one of these bundles of peso cash to pay for a dinner for 24 family members at a great restaurant in Tucumán called Di Vino. We tried a dozen different wines, and everyone was served empanadas, salad and a traditional Argentine BBQ (parrillada). The final cost with a tip thrown in (most Argentines tip very little or nothing at restaurants), was 92,000 pesos, or about $12.80 per person. Our huge suite at a local hotel was $75 a night. A 20 minute taxi ride cost less than $5. We took some friends to an estancia in Tafi del Valle; the bill for 3 rooms for 2 nights (including breakfast) was 126,000 pesos ($420).

You can find good wine for 2000 pesos, empanadas for 250 pesos, steaks for 1,700 pesos. Expensive wines run about 8,000 pesos (the cheapest wine in a trendy US restaurant these days starts at $40). Yesterday we had lunch at Fervor, one of my favorite restaurants in Buenos Aires. There were four of us and we ordered one Parrillada de Pescado y Mariscos—a huge selection of grilled fish, shrimp, squid, and calamari. We couldn't finish it all and it only cost 10,000 pesos ($33). We enjoyed two bottles of my favorite Argentine white wine, MariFlor Sauvignon Blanc, for 8,000 each.

A brief history of the peso: Today, a dollar gets you 300 pesos; a year ago a dollar was worth 200 pesos; two years ago 150; three years ago 70; four years ago 37; and ten years ago about 5. Why has the peso lost so much of its purchasing power? The answer is simple: the government pays most of its bills with the printing press. The M2 money supply has grown from 400 billion pesos 10 years ago to now over 10 trillion pesos. That works out to an annualized growth rate of about 40% per year. M2 has increased about 70% in the past year alone. Not surprisingly, Argentine inflation this year will exceed 100%.

Argentina has actually been suffering from bad monetary policy forever. When I lived there in 1975-79, inflation averaged about 125% per year. If Argentina had not changed its currency by lopping off zeros and renaming it 5 times since 1916 (when a dollar was worth 2 of the original pesos), the exchange rate today would be 3,000,000,000,000,000 pesos per dollar.

As Milton Friedman taught us, inflation is a monetary phenomenon which occurs when the supply of money exceeds the demand for it. Argentina has proved that countless times over the past century. It's no mystery, but nearly everyone—especially the Fed—completely ignores the fact that our inflation problem today started with a huge expansion of our money supply in 2020 and 2021. Most people seem to think that the inflation is up because the economy is "running hot," and that to get inflation down the Fed needs to cause a recession. Not so: the Fed simply needs to slow the growth of the money supply and boost interest rates by enough to restore a balance between money supply and demand. As I explained in my last post, it looks like they have done enough already. 

You can read more about this in my posts over the past two years. This is a good place to start. Also see this. Last June I stopped worrying so much about inflation, and this explains why.

UPDATE (10/12/22): Below is a chart of Argentina's dual exchange rates. The current "market rate" is also known as the "Blue" rate. Note that over the course of almost 17 years, the peso has dropped from 3 to the dollar to now over 300, for a loss of 99%. Cry for Argentina.



18 comments:

A Clark said...

Sounds like a great time. I would guess their tourism industry is booming?

steve said...

Why the hell don't they learn from their mistakes?

Salmo Trutta said...

Savings is not synonymous with the money supply. The banks could continue to lend even if the nonbank public ceased to save altogether. The lending capacity of the banks is dependent upon monetary policy, not the savings practices of the nonbank public.

Cabodog said...

Have a great trip and as always, thank you for sharing your thoughts. I read every post and share as much as I can with friends that are interested in learning economics (that is, common sense real economics).

Salmo Trutta said...

re: "the Fed simply needs to slow the growth of the money supply"

The FED's not tightening into a recession. The underground economy is too big. But the FED is contracting into the deceleration in N-gDp. I.e., the FED is making a policy mistake.

John Gordinier said...

Scott: I spent my junior year abroad as an exchange student in Poland in 1988-89 - the last year before the Wall fell. Poland was in the midst of hyperinflation. There was a black market for USD that was 10x the "official" exchange rate. For a student with only $1,500 in pocket money that had to last 9 months, it was awesome. We could eat well in a fancy (by East Bloc standards) hotel restaurant and the tab would come to $2. We could ride trains first class anywhere in the country for less than $1. A bottle of vodka was $1. At one point one of my fellow American students looked at me and said, "I'll never be this rich again in my life." The Polish girls treated us like we were Mick Jagger. We never wanted to go home. After reading your post I'm tempted to take a sabbatical from work and go to Argentina for a year. But I have a very strong feeling my wife would veto that idea.

Frozen in the North said...

A the good times!!!

In the 1990s I was in Vientiane for a consultation at the request of the US Embassy (you may remember the bar scene in Air America...the bar was in Vientiane..). I was staying in a nice hotel and decided to change $100.00. When the cashier gave me my change in the local currency (the Kip) I actually went back to my room to get a $50.00 note...I was wearing cargo shorts (you know with the big pockets), and the equivalent of $50.00 in Kip was 600,000 kip with the largest bill being 50 kips...

It was very cheap too, took the entire staff of the Embassy to dinner (they were 14 if memory serves) and the total bull for dinner (including a lot of beer and wine) was somewhere around $80.00.

At least you got some 1,000.00 notes -- try with 50's instead.

Enjoy spring!

Dan said...

Are you saying that the QE over the last decade had nothing to do with the rise in inflation, only the pandemic expansion in the money supply?

Carl said...

^Look at:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.pdf?hires=1&type=application/pdf&bgcolor=%23e1e9f0&chart_type=line&drp=0&fo=open%20sans&graph_bgcolor=%23ffffff&height=450&mode=fred&recession_bars=on&txtcolor=%23444444&ts=12&tts=12&width=1168&nt=0&thu=0&trc=0&show_legend=yes&show_axis_titles=yes&show_tooltip=yes&id=BOGZ1FL193020005Q,USGSEC,TOTRESNS&scale=left,left,left&cosd=2000-10-10,2000-10-10,2000-10-10&coed=2022-04-01,2022-08-01,2022-08-01&line_color=%234572a7,%23aa4643,%2389a54e&link_values=false,false,false&line_style=solid,solid,solid&mark_type=none,none,none&mw=3,3,3&lw=2,2,2&ost=-99999,-99999,-99999&oet=99999,99999,99999&mma=0,0,0&fml=a,a%2A1000,a%2A1000&fq=Quarterly,Monthly,Monthly&fam=avg,avg,avg&fgst=lin,lin,lin&fgsnd=2020-02-01,2020-02-01,2020-02-01&line_index=1,2,3&transformation=lin,lin,lin&vintage_date=2022-10-10,2022-10-10,2022-10-10&revision_date=2022-10-10,2022-10-10,2022-10-10&nd=1987-10-01,1947-01-01,1959-01-01

Looking at checkable deposits as a reasonable proxy for money supply, you see that, since GFC, both QE and commercial banks' balance sheet expansion (increased holdings of government debt; effectively direct financing of government) contributed to rising deposits (faster than GDP). Starting in Q2 2020, you get a combination of extreme easing and extreme commercial banks' expansion of government debt holdings (on top of supply-side restrictions) and you get transitory (exact definition to be defined because of lags) inflation.

Tom Nugent said...

Some other price memories. As a first lieutenant in the U.S. Army stationed in Viet Nam in 1966: Filet Mignon dinner: $1.60; mixed cocktails $.10. Taxi rides started at $.18. I didn't take the offer to join two fellow officers and rent a villa for $250 a month, ladies included. The dollar was king and we could get the local currency (the piastre) in the black market for ten times the official rate. At the PX, a Rolex Sub Mariner was $300. Those were the days!

wkevinw said...

Off-Topic: Bernanke Nobel Prize

This is truly a sign of the total dysfunction of our institutions at this point in history. There are so many videos available on the www of Mr. Bernanke being so wrong about real-world economics, that anybody who really respected the discipline would steer clear of him for any such award.

It does appear that the powers that be want to assert their power for the sake of it; i.e. they can give anybody these prizes that they want to. They have the power and the rest of us don't.

Sad.

Carl said...

^If into the real world thing, read the following (Mr. Bernanke teaching a lesson to Japan in 1999):
http://www.sistematikrisk.com/wp-content/uploads/Japanese-Monetary-Policy.pdf
Especially:
"Among the more important monetary-policy mistakes were 1) the failure
to tighten policy during 1987-89, despite evidence of growing
inflationary pressures, a failure that contributed to the development
of the “bubble economy”; 2) the apparent attempt to “prick” the stock
market bubble in 1989-91, which helped to induce an asset-price crash;
and 3) the failure to ease adequately during the 1991-94 period, as
asset prices, the banking system, and the economy declined
precipitously."
Of course, history doesn't repeat but it often rhymes and 'we' may be in Act 2 and about to start Act 3?

Benjamin Cole said...

The upshot: Nations with high inflation rates have great food.

This post made me hungry.

Scott Grannis said...

Dan, re "Are you saying that the QE over the last decade had nothing to do with the rise in inflation, only the pandemic expansion in the money supply?"

In a sense yes, but with a caveat: the pandemic expansion of M2 was not inflationary during the first 6-9 months, because there was huge increase in the demand for money during that period. But then M2 kept growing while the demand began collapsing as confidence returned. That was when inflation took off in earnest.

Salmo Trutta said...

Monetary lags are math constants. Monetary policy is not transmitted through interest rates. Monetary policy was transmitted through legal reserves (which Powell discontinued).

Now we are lost without a rudder or an anchor. As I said in response to Powell removing legal reserves: "The FED will obviously, sometime in the future, lose control of the money stock." May 8, 2020. 10:38 AMLink

Ataraxia said...

If U.S. Fiscal authorities know they can bypass traditional FED plus fractional reserve or banking system money supply expansion seems they will dangerously use this option again in the future.

wkevinw said...

Headline PPI continued its downward movement in today's data release. It's slower than I thought for sure. I thought headline cpi would be 5-7% by now. Let's see what CPI says tomorrow, but I am guessing a modest continuation of the downward movement. Too modest for consumers I'm sure. The fed govt and fed reserve have baked inflation into the economic cake for another several months at least.

Salmo Trutta said...

George Garvy: “Experience shows that a varying volume of money spending may be supported by a constant stock of money and, conversely, experience also teaches us that the money supply may change significantly while the rate of spending remains almost unchanged. Thus, total money spending in relation to money balances—technically, “transactions velocity”—is an important element in assessing changes in the credit situation and in business conditions.”

Interest is the price of loan-funds [the free market’s deterministic clearing rate]. The price of money is the reciprocal of the generalized price-level [the FRB_NY’s “trading desks” bailiwick].

If you look at the old "Total Checkable Deposit" figures (the "means-of-payment" money supply subject to required reserves), you'll notice a stark, unparalleled, expansion in the money stock.
Total Checkable Deposits (DISCONTINUED) (TCDNS) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

It’s no wonder that Powell muddied up deposit classifications.

It's no happenstance that it will take a 2-3 year period of zero money growth to bring inflation down to tolerable levels.