The only way that the Fed could take direct action to solve the housing problem (which is now essentially a problem of falling prices), is to pump so much money into the economy that it lifts all prices. Like a rising tide that lifts all boats, a massive infusion of money would lift all prices. Housing prices might stop falling as other prices, including incomes, rose. Housing could quickly become more affordable, and inflationary policies would once again heat up the demand for physical things, since those are what hold their value during times of inflation.
A cut of 0.25% in the funds rate is not going to be the key to unlocking a flood of new money. But it could weaken demand for dollars (since easy money undermines the long-term value of a currency), and that would be a lot worse than any amount of stimulus that lower rates might imply. Don't forget also that the Fed can only control short-term interest rates; the rest of the yield curve is determined by the market.
If I were Bernanke, I would not want to cut rates tomorrow. I would want to signal to the market that my next move would be to raise rates, because I'm more concerned about inflation and the value of the dollar than I am about the solvency of some investment banks.
No comments:
Post a Comment