Thursday, January 14, 2021

Last year in a nutshell

In April of last year I predicted that the shutdown of the US economy would prove to be the most expensive self-inflicted injury in the history of mankind. Unfortunately, I turned out to be right. We now know that an economic lockdown is virtually useless to stop a contagious pathogen, but it is powerfully destructive of economies, business, livelihoods, and the social fabric. Along the way it spawned enormous, unprecedented, and far-reaching changes in both the economy and the financial markets. 

At the risk of oversimplification, here's how I would describe, in a nutshell, what has happened this past year from an economist's perspective:

The biggest financial event of the year was when the Fed decided, correctly, to accommodate a huge increase in the public's demand for money and money equivalents by purchasing about $3 trillion of notes and bonds, transmogrifying them into T-bill substitutes by paying for them with bank reserves. This facilitated an almost $3 trillion increase in bank savings and demand deposits (banks effectively lent their cash inflows to the Fed in exchange for bank reserves), and this all worked to accommodate the public's unprecedented desire to boost risk-free savings balances in the face of massive Covid-related uncertainties. 

The demand for money now looks to be weakening, but the Fed has not yet taken steps to reverse last year's note and bond purchases. This is resulting in an excess supply of money, and that is showing up in rising commodity prices, rising real estate values, rising equity prices, and a weaker dollar (i.e., too much money chasing a relatively fixed supply of assets). Meanwhile, interest rates are very low, especially real interest rates. Very low real interest rates are not necessarily the result of Fed policy; more likely, they reflect a market that is very risk-averse (i.e., willing to pay extremely high prices for risk-free assets) and a market that expects long-term growth in the economy to be weak for the foreseeable future (risk-free real interest rates tend to track the economy's trend rate of growth). Commodity prices have rallied impressively since last March, as fears have faded and global industrial and construction demand has rebounded. Even after rising strongly for the past 9-10 months (with average PE ratios now topping 30), equities still have an earnings yield which is very attractive relative to the yields on safer assets, and that will likely help drive equity prices even higher. Stocks don't necessarily look overvalued when compared to the lower-risk alternatives available in the bond market.

With the Fed promising to keep interest rates very low for an extended period, the risk of higher inflation is rising, fueled by a continued—and probably growing—oversupply of money. This is already showing up in higher breakeven inflation rates, which are up from a low of 0.5% last March to now a bit over 2%. The market has yet to price in a significant increase in inflation beyond what we have seen in the past decade or so, however. My sense from the gist of Powell's recent comments is that the Fed wouldn't mind inflation exceeding 2% for a year or so, since that would "make up" for their having undershot their inflation target in recent years. The Fed might be content to sit back and enjoy some extra inflation, but that borders on the hubristic belief that they can fine-tune things at a later date. Color me skeptic, but for now an unexpected and painful Fed tightening is not in the cards. Meanwhile, bond yields are rising and the yield curve is steepening in anticipation of an eventual Fed tightening. Higher yields pose little threat to today's equity market because liquidity remains abundant and a growing economy naturally supports higher yields. 

As for the economy, the shutdown was the perfect "Black Swan" event which shocked the US and the global economies to their foundation. We've weathered the storm remarkably well, thanks in large part to central banks' willingness to accommodate the sharp increase in money demand that accompanied the shutdown. Many sectors of the economy have recovered most or even all of their shutdown losses, but there remain pockets that continue to suffer (e.g., restaurants, travel, entertainment). It will likely take years for displaced workers to find new jobs. Fiscal stimulus is justified only to the extent that we owe compensation to those whose lives and businesses were ruined by government fiat. Sending out more checks to everyone would be foolish. If Biden is able to push through a huge "stimulus" package I believe that would only retard the recovery. It would also work to permanently slow the path of future growth, much as happened with Obama's trillion-dollar, "shovel-ready" stimulus. Government simply can't spend money efficiently, and wasting scarce resources only serves to cripple future economic growth.

What follows are a series of charts which flesh out the story:

Chart #1

Chart #1 shows the level of the M2 money supply, widely considered to be the best measure of "money." It consists primarily of bank savings deposits (by far the largest component), currency in circulation, demand deposits, retail checking accounts, retail money market funds, and small time deposits. It's money that is safe and easily spendable by the average person. As the green line shows, M2 historically has risen about 6-7% per year on average. It dipped below that in 2018 and 2019 when the economy was growing and confidence was returning, but then it soared in the wake of Covid shutdowns. 

Chart #2

Chart #2 shows how the M2 measure of money supply tends to track the level of nominal GDP over time. That's natural: the bigger the economy, the more money it takes to turn the wheels of commerce. It also highlights just how dramatically things have changed in the past year: M2 exploded to the upside in the second quarter of last year, while GDP collapsed, only to subsequently rebound strongly in the third quarter. GDP probably grew at a 10% annualized growth rate in the fourth quarter, which I have plotted in this chart. By now, nominal GDP has most likely fully recovered its second quarter loss. Note, however, the huge and unprecedented gap that remains between M2 and GDP. This is arguably the biggest untold story of the Covid collapse and recovery.

Chart #3

Chart #3 shows the ratio of M2 to nominal GDP, which I refer to as "money demand." M2 is a good measure of money and nominal GDP is a good proxy for income. The ratio of the two can be thought as the amount of money (cash and cash equivalents) the average person wants to hold relative to his or her annual income. What we see here is a dramatic and unprecedented rise in the demand for money which occurred in the wake of the Covid shutdowns. People were panicked and wanted extra cash for security In a broad sense, personal savings exploded upwards. The Fed accommodated this as I explained above. But already the demand for money is beginning to decline. It's a good guess that by the time things return to "normal" in the economy, the ratio will drop to 70% or less.

Chart #4

Chart #4 shows the 3-mo. annualized growth rate of the largest component of the M2 money supply: demand and savings deposits. I think this is also a good proxy for money demand. Why? Because the interest rate that banks pay on savings and demand deposits is virtually zero. People currently hold $14.5 trillion of this stuff, and they don't own it because of the interest it pays. They own it because they want the safety and liquidity of this form of money. Note that money demand exploded as the economy collapsed, but since then the growth of money demand has slowed dramatically. In the past three months it's up at a mere 10% annualized rate.

It's quite possible that as the economy continues to grow and confidence gradually returns, the demand for this form of money is likely to decline. People won't want to hold such a huge amount of their annual income in the form of money. So what will they do? The problem is that money can't just disappear, even if people try to spend it. If I withdraw $10,000 from my savings to fix up my house, someone else (Home Depot, plumbers, carpenters, appliance manufacturers) will end up with the money. Key point: all the extra money that was created in the Covid collapse can disappear if the Fed reverses its asset purchases.* To date they continue to expand their balance sheet and they have given no time table for when they might begin to withdraw money or raise short-term interest rates.

*Actually, there is a way that excess money can "disappear" without any action on the Fed's part. If the economy grows and prices rise, so will incomes. If nominal GDP (i.e., income) grows by enough (especially if there is a lot of inflation), while M2 grows at a slower rate, the ratio of M2 to GDP will decline, and people will have effectively reduced their demand for money. 

The Fed can accommodate declining money demand by either 1) reversing its asset purchases and/or 2) allowing a significant increase in inflation. So this is where inflation—rising prices—comes into the picture.

Chart #5

Chart #5 shows an index of non-energy industrial commodity prices. They have surged some 40% since the end of last March. Excess dollars have found their way into a whole range of prices. Copper is up 70% since March; crude oil 170%; lumber 30%, raw industrials 25%; and Bitcoin 500%, to name just a few.

Not coincidentally, the dollar dropped over 10% at precisely the same time as all these other prices rose. 

Chart #6

Chart #6 compares the same non-energy industrial commodity price index as Chart #5 (but this time as measured in real terms) compared to the inverse of an index of the US dollar vis a vis other major currencies. That the two almost always move together suggests strongly that much if not most of the change in commodity prices is simply a function of the value of the dollar: a weaker dollar corresponds to higher commodity prices and vice versa. This is all consistent with what we would expect to see if the value of the dollar is impacted by a change in dollar supply vs. dollar demand.

Chart #7

Interestingly, and perhaps not surprisingly, gold prices soared in the past 2-3 years, as we see in Chart #7. Gold is supposedly notorious for being far-sighted. TIPS prices (the blue line, using the inverse of their real yield as a proxy for their price) also soared. Both prices have been more or less joined at the hip for many years, which is itself quite interesting. 

Chart #8

Chart #8 compares the nominal yield on 5-yr Treasuries with the real yield on 5-yr TIPS. The difference between the two is the market's expected annual rate of consumer price inflation over the next 5 years (on average). Here we see that inflation expectations have soared since March, rising from 0.5% to now just over 2%. The market is correctly interpreting the intersection of the Fed's willingness to supply money and the market's declining demand for money: higher inflation. 

Chart #9

But inflation needs to rise above 2% on a sustained basis before it catches the Fed's eye. As Chart #9 shows, the ex-energy version of the CPI has risen almost exactly 2% per year on average for the past 18 years. That's our baseline. It's also consistent with inflation according to the core personal consumption deflator (the Fed's preferred measure of inflation) of about 1.6-1.7% per year (the CPI does tend to overstate inflation by a bit because of its rigid construction, whereas the PCE deflator adjusts dynamically to changes in consumer preferences). So far, while it's true that inflation expectations have jumped, they are not yet "unmoored" or uncomfortably high.

Chart #10


Chart #11

Chart #12

Chart #13

Chart #14

As for the economy, the manufacturing sector is fairly booming, as Chart #10 shows. Manufacturing all over the world is booming, post-Covid-crash, though the US appears to be enjoying the strongest boom. A similar chart focusing on the service sector (Chart #11) is not nearly so boomy. The labor-intensive areas of services (e.g., restaurants, stores, leisure, entertainment) are having real trouble living and thriving as Covid cases and deaths surge all over the world. Vaccines will ultimately save the day, but not for at least several months. Chart #12 confirms that; service sector businesses do not expect to be in a strong hiring mode for at least awhile. Charts #13 and #14 show that while there was a welcome surge in air travel around the holidays, air travel has since returned to a path that marks a very slow recovery from the depths of last April. Currently, air travel is running about two-thirds less than what it was a year ago at this time.

Chart #15

Chart #15 is interesting because it ties interest rates to the health of the physical economy. I've plotted 10-yr Treasury yields in red, and the ratio of copper to gold prices in blue. This latter ratio is quite sensitive to changes in global manufacturing activity. The ratio has turned up sharply, as copper prices have soared alongside slumping gold prices and manufacturing and construction have surged. This presages a significant increase in interest rates which appears to have just begun. Beware bonds.

Chart #16

Chart #16 compares US to Eurozone equity prices. The US continues to enjoy a substantial advantage, but in general equity prices around the world are on the rise.

Chart #17

I know there are lots of people worried that the stock market is a bubble waiting to burst. It sure looks like easy money has helped inflate the equity balloon. But there are calculations under the surface that support further equity price gains. Chart #17 illustrates that. It shows the difference between the earnings yield on the S&P 500 (the inverse of the PE ratio) less the yield on the 10-yr Treasury (the traditional equity hedge for long-term investors). The resulting equity risk premium is still relatively high from an historical perspective. Think of it this way: equity investors today have to pay $30 to have a claim on $1 of after-tax corporate profits, but bond investors have to pay $83 for $1 per year of interest on 10-yr Treasuries. Aren't equities much more attractive than bonds? And incredibly more attractive than cash, which yields nothing? Selling stocks is very hard in the current environment, no matter what you think of the Fed's monetary policy or Biden's fiscal policy.

Chart #18

Chart #18 reminds us that, despite high and rising equity prices, the market remains fairly cautious, as seen in the still-elevated level of the Vix "fear" index. Very low interest rates in general are another sign of caution, or least strong risk-aversion, since investors are willing to pay sky-high prices for the safety of cash and Treasuries. The market doesn't yet look like it's over its skis.

A final commentary: the Democrats' margin of victory wasn't exactly compelling in the recent elections, but it was enough, apparently, to loose all of Washington's worst instincts: stimulus spending, industrial policy (think Green New Deal), free money sent to nearly everyone, and the return of many of the regulatory burdens that Trump managed to erase. To make matters worse, "cancel culture" is in full bloom, aimed at curtailing our civil liberties and silencing critics. It's nothing short of mob rule punctuated by spontaneous lynchings of anyone who dares challenge the politically correct dogma of the day. Whatever happened to the rule of law? Vaccines and subsidies are now handed out according to one's race and skin color? I am shocked and dismayed to see all this sweeping the country. This is not the unity that we were promised, it is just the opposite.

I think this all argues for a replay of the slow-growth Obama years. We probably have another 3-6 months of catch-up growth with recovery tailwinds for help, but beyond that it is tough to see robust growth. That's not an outlier forecast, though, since the current level of real yields is consistent with very weak long-term growth expectations. So I hope I'm wrong.

Finally, I would once again strongly recommend that you subscribe to my friend Steve Moore's Hotline. It''s free, and if you're like most of the people I know, you will find it to be quite refreshing, easy to read, and full of interesting information about the things that matter to the economy—even a dose of humor here and there. Many of my friends have remarked that it's one of their favorite things to read each weekday. Caveat: it may make you a target for the cancel culture.

Monday, December 14, 2020

We're richer than ever

Every time the stock market reaches new highs, the worrywarts trot out their bubble theories. That is especially true today, since "everyone knows" that central banks all over the world have been pumping money by the kiloton. Surely the stock market this time is inflated, and it wouldn't take much to pop this bubble, right? 

In my 40 years as an investor I have lived though four equity market disasters which were invariably termed popped bubbles by many pundits. The most recent—which began last March—was burst by the Global Pandemic Shutdown. Prior to that we had the onset of the Great Recession in 2008, which left the entire world financially and economically devastated by early 2009. Prior to that we had the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2001-2002. My first popped bubble came in 1987, when I worked at Leland O'Brien Rubenstein (LOR), which many accused of precipitating the bursting (LOR invented "portfolio insurance"). 

Are we getting close to the next popped bubble? I wish I knew. But I don't think it's obvious or inevitable, at least for awhile. The best I can do is to survey the charts which follow, since they help to put the current situation in perspective. What I think they show is that over the long march of financial history, things just get better and better. The occasional bubbles are painful, but they are eventually overcome, thanks to the engines of free markets, free trade, and the incentives of capitalism. And while monetary policy has never been as "easy" as it is today, other important measures of financial and economic well-being are not out of line with what we have seen in my lifetime.

Despite all the huge ups and downs, the average person today is richer than ever before. And he or she will likely be even richer before too long—it has been ever thus. This is the fundamental case for being a long-term, rational optimist. 

Chart #1

Chart #1 shows the key components of the net worth of U.S. households and non-profit organizations (total assets minus total liabilities). Most of the increase since the Great Recession has been healthy: financial assets have soared, while real estate and debt have increased moderately. This has not been a debt-fueled expansion like we saw in the runup to 2008.

Chart #2

Households' balance sheets have improved dramatically since 2008, as shown in Chart #2, thanks to the fact that financial asset valuations have improved by much more than the increase in debt. Households' leverage (total debt as a percent of total assets) has dropped by almost 38% since 2008, and it has not been this low since late 1983. Without excessive leverage in the system, the system becomes inherently more stable.

Chart #3
 
Our government's net worth has taken a beating, thanks to the federal government borrowing just over $4 trillion this past year. Total federal debt owed to the public now slightly exceeds our GDP for the first time since WW II (see Chart #3). Doesn't this just offset the declining leverage of the household sector? Not exactly.

Chart #4

Federal debt is huge, but that is not as bad as you might think, thanks to the extremely low level of Treasury yields. As Chart #4 shows, the true burden of the federal debt (debt service costs as a percent of GDP, which is equivalent to the debt burden of your household, which is debt service payments as a percent of your annual income) is historically quite low. Federal debt ratios have increased, but the debt burden has decreased; interest costs have fallen even as total debt has increased. Federal debt burdens could become problematical in the future, but only after years of rising interest rates and continued borrowings.

Chart #5

Meanwhile, the real, inflation-adjusted net worth of the private sector (see Chart #5) has been steadily increasing. The nominal and real net worth of the U.S. private sector is at its highest level ever. As the chart also suggests, real net worth tends to increase by about 3.6% on average over time. That is extraordinary. Yes, there have been huge setbacks along the way, but in the end, things continue to improve. This chart also suggests that conditions today are not out of line with historical experience. As least they are not nearly as bad as the period just prior to the Great Recession.

Chart #6

To be fair, the growth of the U.S. population and its workforce accounts for some portion of our increased net worth. Chart #6 addresses that issue. It is the result of dividing the statistics in Chart #5 by the size of the US population. The chart suggests that the average person in the U.S. has a net worth of about $370K, which is about six times our per capita income. To be sure, there are lots of billionaires which are likely distorting these numbers, but what really counts is the aggregate wealth of our country, since that wealth is a function of all the roads, bridges, trucks, stores, houses, factories, corporations, knowledge, computers and personal services that are available to each and every one of us. On this basis also it's clear that things have never been so good. Never before has the average person enjoyed the benefits of such an elaborate infrastructure we have today.

Chart #7

Chart #7 shows the long-term view of the progress of U.S. corporations, as proxied by the S&P 500 index. Here we see that the nominal value of our major corporations has increased by about 7% per year on average. Nominal net worth per capita has increased by almost 6% over the same period. Corporate wealth has likely outpaced individual wealth because globalization has allowed our corporations to expand their market share worldwide. Caveat: take all trend-line projections such as this with a grain of salt; they have a large subjective content. 

Chart #8

Chart #8 shows the nominal value of global equities, which, since 2004, has increased by almost 8% per year and now stands at a lofty, all-time high of $100 trillion, according to Bloomberg. (Note that this calculation is based on actively traded primary securities, which means that ETFs and ADRs are excluded in order to avoid double-counting.)

Chart #9

Chart #9 compares the market cap of US and Non-US equities. US equity valuations have improved by far more than non-US equities since the Great Recession, but non-US equities have slightly outperformed for the whole period. 


Friday, December 11, 2020

"Texas or Bust"

Here's another cartoon from my friend Hector Cademartori. It's a sorry commentary on California's one-party system which seems hell-bent on curbing pollution and eliminating bumper-to-bumper traffic by making the state a bad place to do business.


         (click to enlarge)

Virtually everyone we know here in California admits to at least one time considering a move to another state.