Kamala's tax proposals: frightening!

If you subscribe to my good friend Steve Moore's daily Hotline (subscribe for free here), you have already seen this. I reprint it so as to maximize its distribution. These proposals are so astoundingly anti-business and anti-prosperity that I can't imagine they will ever see the light of day. But at the very least you have here a liberal wish-list that, if even partially enacted, would very likely eviscerate the economy. Click here for more background info.

Kamala Proposes $5 Trillion in New Taxes – the Biggest Tax Hike in the History of the World

We've argued that Harris-Walz is the most anti-business ticket by a major presidential party in our lifetimes and perhaps in American history. And we said this BEFORE we saw the new tax plan.  Instead of lowering tax rates to make America more competitive, it raises nearly everyone. The Harris tax plan would: Raise the corporate tax from 21% to 28% Quadruple the tax on stock buybacks from 1% to 4% Double the global minimum tax from 10% to 20% Raise the top Income tax rate from 37% to 39.6% Raise the corporate alternative minimum tax from 15% to 21% Raise the capital gains tax from 24% to 43.5% Impose the first-ever tax on unrealized capital gains at 25% Double the number of Americans subject to the death tax

+ The compounding effect of these multiple tiers of taxation would mean that a $100 investment in a new company could be subject to an 80% tax rate.

Excess M2 continues to fade away

Long-time readers of this blog know that I have been one of only a handful of observers who have linked excessive M2 growth (i.e., money printing) to the big inflation problem that hit the US economy beginning in the first part of 2021. (Here is one of my first posts on the subject in Feb. '21.) I continue to believe that excessive M2 growth was the biggest story that virtually no one—especially the Fed—paid any attention to, until it was too late. Fortunately, this problem began fading away two years ago, and it continues to do so.

It took the Fed a full year before they began to tighten policy, and as I see it, they could have begun to ease at least a year ago, but we now know they won't begin to cut rates until the mid-September FOMC meeting. Better late than never, I suppose, but their tardiness risks destabilizing the interest-sensitive sectors of the economy, particularly housing. In the meantime, the monetary fundamentals support the outlook for continued low inflation.

Chart #1

The M2 measure of the money supply grew at a fairly constant rate of 6% per year from 1995 through 2019. Then it exploded higher beginning in April 2020 as $6 trillion of Covid "stimulus" checks flooded the economy. Once the dust had cleared by late 2021, an extra $6 trillion of deficit spending had been monetized and was sitting in the form of readily spendable currency, bank deposits, and checking accounts (all components of the M2 money supply). This was the fuel for rising prices in 2022.

As Chart #1 shows, M2 has been flat to down since late 2021. It rose a mere 1.3% in the 12 months ending July '24 (according to the latest figures from the Fed, released earlier today). The monetary situation is almost back to normal, as M2 today sits only $1.6 trillion above its long-term trend growth.

Chart #2

Chart #2 compares the growth in M2 with the level of the federal budget deficit. This chart is the smoking gun which proves that the source of our great inflation episode was deficit-fueled spending. Fortunately, deficit spending is no longer being monetized; unfortunately, we still have a monstrous deficit spending problem. Deficits are primarily the result of excessive government spending, and that weakens the economy because it wastes scarce resources.  

Chart #3

Chart #3 compares the growth of M2 to CPI inflation with a one-year lag. Roughly speaking, increases in M2 growth are followed by increases in inflation one year later. This chart suggests that we have another year or so of low and falling inflation "baked in the cake," thanks to very low money growth in the past year. 

Chart #4

Chart #4 shows the ratio of M2 to nominal GDP. I think this is the best way to measure money demand. Think of it as a proxy for the amount of spendable money (cash, checking accounts, bank savings accounts, CDs, and retail money market funds) that people want to hold as a percent of their annual income. (Nominal GDP is an excellent proxy for national income.) Money demand soared in 2020, and that kept trillions of dollars of newly-minted M2 from creating inflation. It then collapsed, and that caused people to spend the money they had previously stockpiled. Extra demand fueled by unwanted money collided with supply-chain shortages to produce sharply higher prices.

I suspect that money demand is approaching sustainable levels, just as excess money supply (M2) is shrinking. That is a prescription for low and stable inflation. 

Mortgage rate relief is coming

The minutes of the July 31st FOMC meeting released today tell us it's now virtually certain that the Fed will cut rates at the September 18th FOMC meeting. The only question is by how much. The market has already priced in a cut to 5.0%, and 4.8% is not out of the question at all—the market expects the funds rate to fall 200 bps over the next 12 months. Thanks to these anticipated cuts, the 10-yr Treasury yield has fallen to 3.8%, down significantly from a high of 5.0% last October. 30-yr fixed mortgage rates—which are driven primarily by the 10-yr Treasury yield—have fallen from a high of 7.8% last October to just under 6.5% today.

But as the chart below shows, the spread between these two rates is still quite high from an historical perspective. That's due in part to the extreme volatility of 10-yr yields in the past few years. Investors need extra spread protection in this environment in order to buy mortgages, since falling yields trigger refinancings (which turn long-dated mortgage bonds into cash) and rising yields encourage homeowners to avoid refinancings (which leaves the investor saddled with a low-yielding fixed rate mortgage in a rising rate environment). When rates are relatively calm, as they were in the mid 2010s, the spread traded around 150 bps; today it is over 250 bps.

What I would expect to see is 10-yr yields settling down in a 3.5-4% range, and mortgage spreads tightening to 150 bps or less. That would put 30-yr mortgage rates at around 5-5.5%. And that would give a huge boost to the struggling housing market because it would make homes much more affordable.