So the market is convinced the Fed will be on hold through at least the end of the year. But a look inside the inflation statistics suggests that is likely to be unnecessary; inflation is very likely to continue to decline in the months to come. At some point, likely well before year end, the Fed is going to have to concede that inflation has been licked—and lower rates accordingly.
And now for some charts:
Chart #1
Chart #1 shows the quarterly annualized rate of inflation according to the GDP deflator. This is the broadest and most inclusive measure of inflation that we have. In the second quarter prices throughout the economy rose at a mere 2.2% annualized rate—exactly in line with the Fed's target. Why is no one else talking about this? To me, it's abundantly clear that inflation is yesterday's news. Inflation is more likely to decline further than it is to rise.
Chart #2
Chart #2 looks at the 6-mo. annualized growth of the Consumer Price Index with and without shelter costs, the latter of which comprise over one-third of the total. I've been highlighting this for a long time: shelter costs are notorious for measuring housing prices and rents with a lag of one year or more. Absent shelter costs, the CPI over the past six months is up at a teeny-tiny annualized rate of only 0.6%! Including shelter costs, the CPI over the past six months is up at a 2.6% annualized rate, which is only slightly above the Fed's 2% target. (Actually, the Fed is targeting 2% for the PCE deflator, which is equivalent to about a 2.5% CPI.) Why all the anguish about inflation "still running hot?"
Chart #3
Chart #4
It's well-known that housing prices and rents stopped rising about a year ago, but owner's equivalent rent, the largest single component of the CPI (red line) is still rising, albeit at a somewhat slower rate in recent months. As Chart #3 shows, OER lags changes in housing prices by about 12-18 months. As Chart #4 shows, OER inflation has been falling—and it will very likely continue to fall for the next 6-9 months. Before the year is out, OER disinflation might well be enough to cause the overall CPI to turn negative.
Chart #5
Chart #5 shows the three major components of the Personal Consumption Deflator, which increased by 3.0% in the year ending June. Note how both the non-durable goods and durable goods indices have been unchanged since June of last year. This means that the only source of inflation in the economy since June of 2022 has been in the service sector. Shelter costs figure prominently in this sector, just as they figure prominently in the CPI. Shelter costs are badly measured; correcting for that we find that inflation is no longer a problem.
Chart #6
Chart #6 shows the percentage of businesses who report paying higher prices, according to the ISM survey. Only 57% reported paying higher prices in July, and that is about the same number that reported paying higher prices in the year prior to Covid. In short, we're back to where we started on inflation.
Chart #7
Chart #7 shows the nominal and real yields on 5-yr Treasuries and TIPS, and the difference between them (green line), which is the market's expectation for what CPI inflation will average over the next 5 years. By this measure, the bond market fully expects the Fed will deliver on its inflation promise: 5-yr inflation expectations are about 2.2%.
Chart #8
Now let's turn to the economy. Contrary to the hand-wringers who lament that the economy is "running hot" and thus we're unlikely to see further declines in inflation, Chart #8 (monthly changes in private sector jobs) makes it clear that the growth of private sector jobs has been declining since early 2022. The private sector is the one that counts, and jobs there have grown by only 2.2% in the past year. That's down sharply from the 5.0% year over year growth rate through July '22. Over the past six months, private sector jobs have increased at only a 1.6% annualized rate. Judging by the jobs market, the economy is unlikely to do much better than 2% going forward. That's not even close to "running hot" in my book.
Chart #9
Chart #9 compares the level of inflation-adjusted GDP (blue line) with two trend lines (green and red dashed lines). It's plotted on a log scale axis, which means constant rates of growth show up as straight lines. Here we seen that since the summer of 2009, the US economy has grown on average by about 2.1% per year. That's way less than the 3.1% growth trend that prevailed from 1965 through 2007—21% less, in fact. If the economy had followed a 3.1% trend growth path, it would be 26% larger today. We live in a slow-growth world, thanks to massive (and terribly wasteful) government spending on transfer payments and inefficient "green" energy.
Economic growth has been sluggish for the past 14 years, yet that didn't stop inflation from rising to double-digit levels. That's because growth has nothing to do with inflation; inflation is all about money. By sharply boosting short-term interest rates since early last year, the Fed has managed to bring money supply and money demand back into line, and that is why inflation has fallen.
M2 growth has slowed dramatically and inflation has fallen because interest rates have soared. Higher interest rates make holding money more attractive, AND they make borrowing money less attractive. The public today is more willing to hold onto M2 and less willing to spend it. The public is less willing to borrow money since interest rates are so high and more willing to pay back existing loans. (Banks create M2 money when they make net new loans.) The result is a balancing of the supply of money and the demand for money, and the gradual disappearance of inflation.
Currently, the market expects the Fed to hold rates steady through the early part of next year, and then to begin easing. If my reading of the monetary and inflation tea leaves is correct, the Fed should begin cutting rates now, not next year. If they wait too long, we will see the CPI entering negative territory (i.e., deflation).
Would deflation be a huge problem? Many seem to think so, but I'm not so sure. The argument against deflation is that consumers would pull back on their spending—and weaken the economy—because cash would become an earning asset. Why buy something now if you can buy it later with fewer dollars? The problem with this line of thinking is that economic growth does not depend on consumers spending money. We don't spend our way to prosperity, we work hard and invest in order to prosper.
Growth is the by-product of savings and investments that boost the productivity of the average worker, in addition to the organic growth of the workforce. For example, and roughly speaking, a 1% increase in productivity plus a 1% increase in jobs results in real economic growth of 2%.
Be patient. Sooner or later the numbers will convince the Fed that lower rates are called for. In the meantime, enjoy an economy that continues to grow, albeit relatively slowly, and inflation that continues to decline.
P.S. Two days ago we returned from a two-week family vacation in West Maui (Napili Bay, to be precise). If you've been following the news, you know that last week an unimaginably disastrous tragedy befell Lahaina, which is about 8 miles south of Napili. Although we suffered no harm, we were without electricity and communications with the rest of the world for 3+ days. Our hearts and prayers go out to those (several of which worked at our hotel) who lost their homes, friends, and family members.
Scott - I was thinking about you and your trips to Napili. We vacation in Kaanapali at the Whaler every other year and are booked for a Feb 2024 trip. Do you think it will take a very long time for this area to recover? Let me know if there is a organization you recommend we can donate to help this wonderful place and its people recover.
ReplyDeleteKaanapali escaped the disaster with barely a scratch. But it will take many months, and probably years, for Lahaina to get back to its former glory. The problem for the next few months will be the lack of infrastructure. For example, there is now only one supermarket, The Times, that is operational for the entire Lahaina-Kapalua area. I'd say you have a decent chance of taking your Feb '24 trip, but it's not a sure thing by any stretch.
ReplyDeleteA gofundme for the hotel we stay at has been set up (https://gofund.me/962e4999) and it has raised $265K in order to help employees and their families. If I learn of others I will add the info to this post.
re: "The public today is more willing to hold onto M2 and less willing to spend it."
ReplyDeleteRight. The ratio of gated deposits to transaction deposits has stopped falling.
But as Dr. Philip George says: “The velocity of money is a function of interest rates” and “Changes in velocity have nothing to do with the speed at which money moves from hand to hand but are entirely the result of movements between demand deposits and other kinds of deposits.”
Link: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LTDACBM027NBOG
“Money has a ‘second dimension’’, namely, velocity . . .. ” Arthur F. Burns in Congressional Testimony.
Atlanta gdpnow Latest estimate: 4.1 percent -- August 08, 2023
Excellent wrap-up where we stand today on inflation and economic growth. I agree, the Fed needs to take a bow, and leave the stage. Maybe even start cutting.
ReplyDeleteI wonder why there is there is the sharp, and seemingly permanent decline in real GDP growth after 2008?
Hearts to our fellow citizens on Hawaii.
Scott,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think the odds are that the Fed continues to raise rates and tip us into a recession? Powell has said repeatedly that he wants to see the labor market "soften." To me, that is economist speak for a recession. Weekly unemployment claims have been rising for the last year; by my calculations, this type of movement has preceded every recession since 1970.
Thanks for all the good work you do.
People are starting to catch up to your thinking Scott. Thanks for explaining all of this to us as it was happening (before in many cases), instead of after.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.aier.org/article/disinflation-dreams-and-keynesian-confusion/
re: "I wonder why there is there is the sharp, and seemingly permanent decline in real GDP growth after 2008?"
ReplyDeleteIt's simple. Banks don't lend deposits. And the nonbanks have a higher money velocity. Bernanke destroyed the nonbanks by remunerating IBDDs. That's why the investment banks were turned into bank holding companies.
Precautionary savings in the banks have recently reversed. Atlanta gdpnow Latest estimate: 5.0 percent -- August 15, 2023 And the cash/drain factor is also reversing.
Scott Grannis money demand is why I read his blog. That's the basis for Dr. Philip George's "single error" in macroeconomics. And Dr. Leland Pritchard, Ph.D., Economics Chicago 1933, M.S. Statistics, Syracuse, was even more literate.
ReplyDeleteThank you for taking time to post and elaborate on your thoughts; much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteMC: thanks!
ReplyDeleteThe other argument against deflation, is that because of us economy structure, i.e. 70% services. It is more difficult to postpone buying services than buying goods.
ReplyDeleteScott, you are probably aware but if not I noticed Ken Fisher referenced your blog on Marketminder.com. "A quality post here that is packed with charts and sound logic attacking the notion that America needed the Fed to crush the economy to rein in inflation."
ReplyDeleteScott, You continue to be the most accurate and well reasoned economist I follow. My questions is on the recent jump in the 10 year treasury interest rate and what is driving that; specifically, there have been stories of China being more of a seller of treasuries than a buyer of treasuries in general, particularly at the margin. Curious as to your thoughts on the 10 year pricing and what is driving it? Thanks! Tom
ReplyDeleteScott, I also have a question about the yield on the 10 year. Inflation has come down and heading lower as you have called and inflation expectations by the five year charts you showed bear that out as you showed but the yield on the 10 year keeps moving higher and is at multi year highs. Why do you think this is happening and where do you see it going? Thanks for all your great analysis . I am a long time follower of your work.
ReplyDeleteScott,
ReplyDeleteI'm relieved to hear that you and the family are fine; I was thinking of you at the time as you mentioned Maui is your favorite summer spot. Tragic what's going on :(
Re: "why are 10-yr Treasury yields rising?"
ReplyDeleteMy best guess is that the market has been spooked by recent news which suggests the economy has most likely picked up speed in the current quarter (the Atlanta Fed GDP Now estimate has surged to 5% or so). The market worries that a stronger economy will in turn worry the Fed, where Phillips Curve thinking remains alive and well. The thinking is that a strong economy will not allow inflation to fall, and that the Fed will therefore either need to raise rates more or hold them higher for longer.
If short-term rates stay high for an extended period, and the market sees this coming, then higher long-term rates are almost inevitable. It's simply bond market math at work.
I know that many blame the big deficit and China weakness for the rise in yields, but I don't buy that line of argument. Deficits only had a small fraction to the outstanding amount of Treasuries in the world, and ultimate all bonds are priced off Treasury yields. Deficit-driven sales of bonds simply aren't big enough to depress the prices of all the bonds out there. What's important is the market's willingness to hold bonds versus holding short-term securities. For example: if the Fed pledged to keep short-term rates at 5% for the next 10 years, would anyone want to buy a 10-yr Treasury yielding 4% today? Of course not.
Thank you for such a helpful clear explanation. Your blog is the best that I read. Last time I posted, to my surprise, I was right and so I thought I would give this another shot. Hope that is OK. Seems to me that your explanation on the 10 year yield rising does not make sense and that it undermines some of your basic, imho, overly optimistic projections for inflation. As the blind man said, we shall see (a saying particularly ironic as I struggle with poor eyesight!).
ReplyDeleteOne caveat, my take is that Putin’s actions have far more to do with future inflation and a resurgence of global trade relationships which is deflationary than is publicly discussed.
Thank you again for your blog! Very grateful to you for your generosity with us layfolks with your expertise.