This post is an update of a thesis I have been working on for many years. It's based on a fundamental tenet of Milton Friedman, who taught us that inflation happens when there is an oversupply of money relative to the demand for it. Newer readers might want to read my description of how I learned to understand this while living in Argentina, and how this helped me predict the big jump in US inflation in the 2021-22 period.
For the past two years money demand has stabilized as M2 growth has picked up moderately. The "bulge" in M2 money supply has been almost completely absorbed by economic growth, with the result that there is no longer a monetary source of inflation that the Fed needs to stop—higher interest rates are not necessary. M2 money supply is once again growing at a 5-6% rate, which is similar to what we saw in the period from 1995 through Q1/20—a period when CPI inflation averaged about 2%. Given
Chart #1
Chart #1 shows the level of the M2 money supply, which grew at a fairly steady rate of about 6% per year from 1995 to just prior to the Covid panic. M2 subsequently exploded as the government "printed" some $6 trillion to pay for an avalanche of Covid-related checks to the population. The Fed began to reverse this process in mid-2022, by raising interest rates and slowing the growth of M2, which has grown by only $500 billion since its 2022 peak. M2 today is only about $1.4 trillion above where it would have been if the 1995-2020 trend growth had continued.
Chart #2
Chart #2 is my way of measuring money demand: M2 divided by nominal GDP. The ratio is a proxy for the amount of readily spendable cash that people want to hold as a percentage of their annual income. For many years (50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s) money demand was fairly stable. That is what led Milton Friedman to assume that the velocity of money in his famous equation (M*V=P*Y) was relatively constant. But as we have learned in recent decades, that is a highly questionable assumption. In my way of looking at things, the demand for money should be the focus (money demand is the inverse of money velocity), since it ties in with the theory that the price level changes when the demand for money exceeds the supply of it.
Sharply rising money demand in the wake of Covid effectively offset the sharp increase in money supply, as evidenced by the fact that inflation didn't pick up until 2021, when money demand started to plunge but money supply remained relatively constant.
Today, Chart #2 tells us that money demand has ceased falling and is picking up just a bit. Combined with the fact that money supply is growing at a "normal" rate, we should expect to see inflation decline modestly, which in fact it has if we exclude shelter costs.
Chart #3
Chart #3 makes a very important point: the growth of private sector jobs has decelerated significantly in recent years. However, the growth rates shown are most likely overstating the true growth rate, given the relatively large downward adjustments the BLS has made after the fact, and especially considering the magnitude of deportations in recent months. True jobs growth might well be only slightly more than half the rates shown in the chart. That amounts to a significant headwind to economic growth, and it has also contributed to depress confidence (most of measures of which are at relatively low levels). Any loss of confidence is likely to increase the public's demand for safety—and money hoarding is a natural response to that. Weak economic growth is likely fueling at least a modest increase in the demand for money. The Fed should respond to this by relaxing policy. And they have, reducing the federal funds rate by a quarter point recently. More cuts are likely in order and I hope they follow soon.



Dear Calafia,
ReplyDeleteIn case you are correct, we will see the economy flourish with more money demand and lower interest rates as your chart shows.
But I have the doubt that that pick in recent months that you show in your m2/gdp chart as a proxy for money demand, will hold up in the future.
Long time, that is 20 or 30 years government bonds are being sold like crazy, raising interest rates in the long term.
This picture, though may not be updated, shows a decrease in money demand…
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1MALQ
Thank you anyway for sharing your thoughts with us
Thanks, Scott. I am more concerned about the future considering the COVID precedent as you noted. Musk just showed the gov is unfixable and the debt deficit will not be substantially reduced. How long until the debt cannot be serviced and M2 will explode to the upside to support it?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the update on money supply and demand. What is your take on the Argentina bailout being proposed by Bissent?
ReplyDeleteRe: Argentina bailout. In an ideal world, Milei would have dollarized the country long ago, and today's concern about another devaluation would be off the table. The reality today is dominated by the need to maintain confidence in the government's ability to continue with its plan, which in turn is dominated by the need to stop printing money in order to finance government spending. In that context, Bessent's offer of lending facilities takes devaluation risk off the table for the time being, and that is a relief to be sure. But that doesn't solve the problem of the need for spending restraint. Huge numbers of Argentines are subsisting on very low retirement benefits and that has created tremendous pressure for increased spending. The election October 26th will be critical in this regard. Can he convince people there is hope for the future? I think he can, but I am nervous.
ReplyDeleteArgentina has a currency swap agreement with China, of about 18 Billion in USD worth (130B yuan) of which 5B was activated; In addition China has loaned many billions more. Argentina can't really repay so, now the USA is stepping in so China gets paid. Also they owe the IMF 14B USD? So the USA is now going to back all of this? While both the USA and Argentina can't really cut their deficit, the difference is that the USA can kick the can for much longer as its debt is in its own currency...
ReplyDeleteThe current+1.0% real Fed funds rate as of August is no threat to jobs, growth and main street prosperity. After all, during much of the time between 1985 and 2000, the real Fed funds rate ranged between+2.5% and +5.0%, even as the real GDP growth rate during that period expanded at a robust 3.4% per annum.
ReplyDeleteI heard a couple of economists discussing the current economy. The bottom half of citizens are experiencing a mildly recessionary job market. The GDP is being held up by AI capital flows, according to their work.
DeleteArgentina has always had great PPP. Not purchasing power parity. But pizza, pasta, and parillada.
ReplyDeleteTariffs, schmariffs, I think inflation is losing steam, and as mentioned Scott Grannis, housing is the killer.
ReplyDeleteThe US has criminalized housing construction, but legalized informal immigration, for decades. We have the results.
People act like Trump was the first president to pressure a Fed Chief.
In 1965, LBJ physically shoved Fed Chair William McChesney Martin against a wall at his Texas ranch to demand lower rates.
Ronald Reagan proposed placing the Fed inside the Treasury, when Volcker was Volcker.
Well, it will be an interesting three years ahead.
J. Powell: "Disinflation for services continues, including for housing." (copied from the website containing the text of his speech.
ReplyDeleteI did some checking, and as far as I can tell, this is a false statement. The most recent PCE print showed services and core services, including rent, having increased in inflation rate.... (maybe I'm wrong???)
I wonder what happened to the old gold and inflation story?
ReplyDeleteThe economy is quite poor for lots of people.
ReplyDelete"New hirings totaled just 204,939 so far in 2025, off 58% from the same period a year ago and the lowest level since 2009, when the U.S. economy was still in the throes of the financial crisis."
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/02/report-shows-hiring-at-lowest-since-2009-as-economists-turn-to-alternative-data-during-shutdown-blackout.html
AI spending is keeping the GDP looking positive.
"...evidence that the AI buildout in data centers and electronics updates are the driving force behind the continued expansion in the economy, fueling outsized stock price gains in the sector (and providing the fuel for wealth effect consumer spending); while the larger consumer sector is not growing at all."
https://bonddad.blogspot.com/2025/10/final-august-durable-goods-orders-more.html
Scott, what do you think the causes (or causes) of the sustained increase in money demand since (roughly) 1994 are?
ReplyDelete1995 through 2019 Averages.
ReplyDeleteM2growth +6%
Nominal GDP growth. +4.8%
GDP deflator. +1.2
Good correlation.
2019 through 2024
M2 growth +6.7%
Nominal GDP growth. +2.4%
GDP deflator. +2.4%
Scott, not sure if you've read today's (Oct 12th) editorial in the WSJ about Argentina, and the recommendation to dollarize (rather than continue to "defend" the peso). Would be interested in your thoughts. And also, if Milei ran on that, and he's proven quite impervious to changing his underlying principles, why do you think he's put off (or changed his mind) on full dollarization? Thank you.
ReplyDeleteScott, could we have a general economy update? Thanks.
ReplyDeletetrump bailout miley,and Oct 26th midterm, any thoughts?
ReplyDelete