Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Stocks climb walls of worry

The bull market in equities has been underway for 5½ years, during which time the total return of the S&P 500 index has been an astounding 222%, for an annualized return of just over 23%. Obviously this can't go on forever. Over the long haul, the total return on equities has been around 8% per year.

Yet corporate profits are at record highs, in nominal and real terms, and in relation to GDP, and the classic precursors of recession (e.g., tight money, high real interest rates, and a flat or inverted yield curve) are so far completely absent. The PE ratio of the S&P 500 is 17.6, which is only slightly above its long-term average of 16. The rally could continue; it's arguably nowhere near bubble territory.

But there are so many things to worry about! Profits might be mean reverting, which could mean a big fall lies ahead; geopolitical tensions are historically high; the U.S. economy is still mired in the weakest recovery in history; President Obama's approval ratings are at an all-time low; Obamacare has thrown the healthcare and jobs market for a loop; Dodd-Frank is crippling the financial industry; Europe is flirting with its third recession in the past 7 years; Japan is still struggling despite massive monetary stimulus; emerging markets are being punished by a stronger dollar and declining commodity prices; the Chinese economic juggernaut is running out of steam; Ebola could become pandemic; QE3 is almost finished, and the Fed's next move is almost certainly going to entail higher interest rates.


The chart above compares the S&P 500 index to the ratio of the Vix index and the 10-yr Treasury yield. I think this latter is a good proxy for "walls of worry." The Vix index by itself is an excellent proxy for the market's level of fear and uncertainty (a rising Vix index means that options on equities are becoming more expensive, which in turn means the market is willing to pay more for options since owning options reduces ones' exposure to risk), while the 10-yr Treasury yield has been an excellent barometer of the market's confidence in the strength of the U.S. economy (Treasury yields fall as investors are willing to accept a lower yield in exchange for their safety, thus making them a refuge in times of weak or negative economic growth). The ratio rises as fear rises and confidence in the economy declines, and it falls as fear declines and confidence in the economy rises. For most of this year, the correlation between the S&P 500 index and the ratio of the Vix index to the 10-yr Treasury yield has been almost perfectly negative: -0.85. That's not surprising at all, but what is of interest is the number of times a significant rise in the Vix/10-yr ratio has coincided with a meaningful decline in equity prices (at least seven times in less that two years, by my count).

Yet each flare-up of worry has subsided, as the fears that worried investors failed to materialize and the U.S. economy kept on growing at a 2-2 ½% pace. In the absence of an actual recession, it's tough to keep the equity market down, especially since the alternative to being exposed to equity risk means giving up tons of yield (and in the case of going to cash, it means giving up yield entirely). The earnings yield on the S&P 500 is currently 5.7% (the inverse of the PE ratio) while the yield on nominally risk-free 5-yr Treasuries is a only 1.6% and the real yield on risk-free 5-yr TIPS is zero.

Despite the long list of worries, there is still no sign that the U.S. economy is about to roll over. Trillion dollar shots of stimulus and Quantitative Easing failed to stimulate growth, and a massive contraction of the federal budget deficit failed to kill growth. The U.S. economy so far has managed to almost completely ignore the weakness of the Eurozone economy and the big slowdown in Chinese economic growth. The U.S. economy is massive in size and over the years has proven to withstand all manner of difficulties (e.g., recall that 9/11 came very near the end of the 2001 recession).

Despite all the negatives, there are some fairly exciting things going on which at the very least could keep the U.S. economy from slumping.


The chart above shows the BLS' measure of job openings. It has jumped by almost 24% year to date, and now surpasses the peak in job openings prior to the last recession. This suggests the outlook for the economy is brighter since businesses are more confident in the future.


Thanks to new fracking technologies, U.S. crude oil production has surged by a phenomenal 60% in just the past three years (it's up almost 80% in the past 5 years), making the U.S. the largest producer of crude oil in the world. So much for "peak oil" and the decline of civilization as we know it. Meanwhile, all that new crude has created tens of thousands of new jobs and, as a welcome side-effect, has given us abundant supplies of very cheap natural gas, which in turn gives U.S. energy-intensive industries a huge leg up on their overseas competitors.


Since mid-January, just after the Fed announced the tapering and eventual demise of QE3, bank lending to small and medium-sized businesses (see chart above) has expanded at a 13.6% annualized pace. This reflects growing confidence on the part of banks and businesses. The tapering of QE (which is almost over) has not resulted in any reduction in the availability of credit. On the contrary.


As the chart above shows, every recession in the past 60+ years has been preceded by a significant tightening of monetary policy. Tight money shows up in high and rising real short-term interest rates (the blue line) and a flat to inverted yield curve (the red line). Today these two variables tell us that monetary policy is still very accommodative, and as such poses no threat to growth. It would take an awful lot of tightening to change that picture, and that is not likely to happen for at least the next 1-2 years.

And then there is the prospect—increasingly likely—that the Republicans take over control of the Senate after next month's elections. At the very least this could be the high-water mark for Big Government. In the years to come we could see regulatory burdens declining instead of increasing; marginal tax rates could ease instead of becoming ever-more burdensome; corporate tax burdens could decline, allowing U.S. corporations to better compete in the world and attracting rather than repelling capital.

In the meantime, as long as the U.S. economy avoids recession, equities are likely to continue to climb recurring walls of worry.

UPDATE: Below is an updated version of the first chart in this post as of the market close on Oct. 10th. The equity selloff has intensified, and the wall of worry has risen.


UPDATE 2: An updated version as of the morning of Oct. 14th. The "wall of worry" has attained impressive levels, with lots of worries about slower growth dragging 10-yr Treasury yields to new lows for the year, while the Vix soars to the mid-20s, propelled by geopolitical tensions and the spreading Ebola crisis.


UPDATE 3: Here's a chart update as of Oct. 21st (am). Fears are receding and stocks are rising. It's been all about fear, since (so far) there has been no deterioration in the economy's fundamentals.


10 comments:

  1. Didn't Japan achieve a recession without an inverted yield curve? The US is not a basket case like Japan but at the same time the economy is not as strong as the previous instances when the yield curve inverted. Is this a good indicator of a recession?

    That said I agree job growth is still positive for the economy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Re Japan: you have a valid point, since Japan's yield curve did not invert prior to the 2008 recession or prior to the 1998 recession. But there were other factors at play which which I would argue were equivalent to a severe tightening of monetary policy. First was the collapse of the S.E. Asian currencies in 1997 which greatly increased the demand for yen, something that the BoJ failed to accommodate. Second, the relentless appreciation of the yen over a period of four decades, itself a manifestation of very tight monetary policy. Third, the near-collapse of the global financial industry in 2008, which sparked a huge increase in the demand for money in major currency blocs, and which was initially not accommodated by the major central banks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent blogging. Monetary policy may be tight, if we consider where interest rates should be, which is in negative numbers. Thus, when the Federal Reserve ends quantitative easing, we in fact have a tight monetary policy. Equity and property markets are fully valued. Looks like tough sledding ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Add on:

    I heartily share Scott Grannis' hopes that a GOP Congress will clamp down on government growth.

    Just because the opposite happened under President Bush jr. and the GOP Congresses of 2000-2006 is no reason to give up hope.

    Okay so Reagan, Bush and Bush jr .all ran huge deficits. I keep hoping.

    After all, Nixon wasn't so bad, and Eisenhower actually balanced the budget.

    There is hope!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice to know that we are not going to hell in a hand basket.

    I have been adding to my equity position on down days.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is it possible to have a profit recession even if we don't have an economic recession? What if Europe and EM goes into a downward spiral and impacts S&P earnings along with the negative impact of USD strengthening?

    ReplyDelete
  7. sgt.red.blue.red said..."I have been adding to my equity position on down days."

    It is too soon to buy this dip. WAIT until you are personally scared then try to have the courage to buy. Not now. Corrections typically take 8 to 12 weeks to run their course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. William, I appreciate your input.

      I'm looking at put call trading volume which hit elevated fear on the big down day earlier this week. I am trickling in dollars.

      I know sooner or later the buy on dips mind set will fail, but I don't think we're at that juncture. But cash position is also growing.

      We'll see ...

      Delete
  8. Prices fallen as geopolitical risks from the Middle East to Ukraine failed to disrupt oil supplies. Crude oil trading range for the day is 5159-5427 as evicted byEpic research.

    ReplyDelete