On June 25th the Fed released the May '24 data for M2 (the release is scheduled for the fourth Tuesday of each month for the previous month's data). There were no surprises.
The M2 story as I tell it goes like this: Beginning shortly after the economy was put into Covid lockdown by overzealous and panicked officials, Washington flooded the economy with some $6 trillion worth of "stimulus" checks in an attempt to mitigate the pain. The public, having no ability or desire to spend this bonanza in an era of extreme uncertainty, allowed the money to accumulate in their bank accounts, thus swelling the M2 numbers but having little impact on the economy. Then, as the economy began to slowly return to normal beginning in early 2021, the public began to spend their bonanza, having little or no desire to let trillions of dollars sit in bank accounts paying little or no interest. Extra, unwanted money began to inflate prices and fuel a return to economic growth. The Fed was slow to realize this, waiting for almost a year to begin (slowly) raising short-term interest rates in an attempt to entice people to hang onto the money. But the damage was done, with the result that the economy was flooded with almost $5 trillion of extra demand (i.e., about 28% more M2 than usual) that enabled the price level to rise by about 20% or so.
Today the economy is once again functioning normally, growing at about a 2% pace. The excess of M2 has been largely worked off, and what remains of above-target inflation is an artifact produced by estimates of shelter costs that seriously lag reality and are questionable at best (see this post for a more detailed explanation). The M2 wave crested two years ago, and ex-shelter inflation has been 2.1% over the past year, well within the Fed's upper limit of 2.5%.
The big inflation episode is essentially over, but the Fed is once again slow to figure this out, and thus reluctant to lower interest rates. Meanwhile, high interest rates have all but crippled the housing market (30-yr mortgage rates at 7% are prohibitive at a time when wages are failing to keep pace with prices). Commercial real estate prices have tumbled over 20% according to figures compiled by the CoStar Group, and there is lots of talk about a coming wave of bankruptcies. Floating-rate loans taken out at 3% interest rates are resetting sharply higher, to the dismay of borrowers already suffering from stagnant real wages. The dollar is king of the hill these days, thanks to world-beating interest rates, but this is squeezing commodity producers as well as the offshore profits of major industries.
To be sure, not all is bad. The Covid lockdowns led to many unforeseen productivity enhancements (e.g., zoom meetings, remote work). The Fed has been reluctant to tighten, so liquidity conditions remain near-optimal. The return of low inflation has boosted confidence. Corporate profits have not disappointed. Credit spreads are low and relatively stable.
Chart #1
Chart #1 illustrates how the almost $5 trillion of "extra" M2 growth has gradually disappeared. The green line extends the growth rate of M2 from 1995 through 2019). Currently, M2 stands only about 9% above where it might have been without the Covid distortions.
Chart #2
Chart #2 shows currency in circulation, which also experienced a burst of growth but has since returned to its long-term trend growth. Currency is a good proxy for money demand, since people only hold currency if they want to—unwanted currency quickly finds its way back to the bank system to be exchanged for interest-bearing deposits. Money demand surged in 2000-2021, but has since returned to "normal" over the past year.
Chart #3
Chart #3 is another way to measure the demand for money, by dividing M2 by nominal GDP. This is a proxy for the amount of liquidity people are comfortable holding as expressed by a percentage of their annual income. Here too we see things are returning to what might be considered "normal," or pre-Covid levels.
To sum up, the monetary situation has for the most part returned to normal. This lends strong support to the belief that the Fed has essentially managed to once again tame inflation. Interest rates are quite likely to decline going forward, and the only question is one of timing. Meanwhile, the Fed has lots of "dry powder" to unleash (in the form of lower interest rates) should the economy stumble.
The biggest obstacle the economy faces now is fiscal policy, which will depend to a great deal on the outcome of the November elections. Much as I detest Trump's personality and his affinity for tariffs, I strongly believe his policies (e.g., lower tax rates, reduced regulation, smaller government) would result in a stronger economy than if Biden were granted another term in office.
P.S. Sorry for the dearth of posts this month. We spent a lot of time in Argentina recently, where, among other things, we attended the Cato conference in Buenos Aires. There is still tremendous enthusiasm for Milei and his policy prescriptions, but there are concerns that he may delay dollarization for too long. In the meantime he has accomplished much more than anyone would have thought possible in his first six months in office.
It has become less clear to me that the Fed will cut rates any time soon. The economy is not collapsing and may fully adapt to current rates, which were not so unusual not so long ago. Plus, the fall in CPI-housing has slowed, contrary to what seemed likely a year ago. If the Fed is not forced to cut by seeing overall CPI significantly below 2% for some time, perhaps they will not.
ReplyDeleteThank you Scott for the post and keeping us up to date with Argentine.
ReplyDeleteThe market remains focused on inflation, and rightfully so.
ReplyDeleteBut I maintain that the bigger worry is economic growth...
Thanks for all the great insight on this blog. It really helps to have a complete explanation from an expert versus weeding through bits and pieces from other sources.
ReplyDeleteI am still trying to reconcile the impact of the severe supply chain disruptions during the pandemic in addition to the impact of the money supply details you have explained in this post.
My first-hand knowledge in 2020 - 2021 from a business standpoint were massive price increases from suppliers (many from overseas - due to Covid related labor and product shortages).
These supply chain shortages created an inflation sunami that hit businesses. Those businesses in turn had to increase their prices significantly as well in order to maintain profit margins. These price increases immediately hit consumers. Businesses subsequently never reduced their prices.
This appears to be separate from the money supply driven inflation mentioned in the post.
How much of the supply chain disruption is responsible for the overall 25% price inflation since January 2020?
John G
John G,
ReplyDeleteI'm sure Scott will give the perfect answer, so just to test my understanding:
1. Some of those disruptions were temporary, we are now long after that event.
2. When households spend on certain items, they have less free income to spend on other items, and so inflation would balance out, in the longer term.
3. When the supply of money is greater than the demand for money (maybe this should be S.G. copyrighted), it means inflation. See above charts and explanation.
4. It's also about measurement and how you balance that measurement. Some aspects of the "standard measurement" are lagging. So CPI is not some objective and all defining quantity.
It would be really nice if the huge spike in "the demand for money" we saw following the 2008 GFC was for private sector capital investment, but it wasn't. It was to monetize deficit spending by the Federal government, debt by state governments and by the private sector when it could establish debt at a lower percentage than dividend payments. Sure, some was used by the private sector for capital investment, but if that drove the significant growth we saw, we would have seen far greater GDP growth or lower profitability than we saw during the ZIRP years.
ReplyDeleteI the decline in M2 as good news, but it needs to fall far below the 6% 25-year CAGR established pre-COVID. Any CAGR is significantly greater than GDP is not sustainable.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-17/trailing-97-of-bond-funds-western-s-flagship-is-losing-cash?utm_source=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy
ReplyDeleteYou know, this has been a crappy year, with wars, and dreadful US politics and hate on college campuses.
ReplyDeleteThe S&P is breaking record highs, up 15% in H1.
Public US corporations are the best-run large organizations on the planet.
Good luck everybody.
Grannis didn't waiver.
ReplyDelete