I'm still doing the blog ad honorem. One of my original motives for starting the blog was to find a way to give back after so many years of taking, and I'd like to think the blog's growing popularity is a sign that I have something valuable to offer. (Caveat lector: free advice can often be worthless.) I've learned a lot my from supply-side mentors, and this is one way of keeping supply-side theory alive, since it is vastly under-appreciated in my experience. I might still be in the workforce if it weren't for my hearing disability, and the blog provides a great outlet for my passion for economics and markets without the need for commitments or commuting.
My political orientation is libertarian and I am a long-time supporter of the Cato Institute, about whom George Will recently said: "Given freedom, the American people will flower. Given the Cato Institute, the American people will, in time, secure freedom." Like Cato, I will disparage any politician, regardless of party, who promotes policies which I find antithetical to free markets and individual liberty. I think every investor should pay great attention to politics, since good or bad policies can make a huge difference to the economy and the markets.
Finally, my thanks to the many loyal readers and commenters. I'm happy to say that the vast majority of the thousands of comments posted here have been thoughtful and constructive. If there is one thing that I miss in retirement, it is the ability to travel the country and interact with clients that in turn were in charge of managing huge sums of money. I have always learned a lot by having to answer tough questions, and I now receive those almost daily.
Congrats on the blog anniversary Scott, but I have to take issue with one thing you wrote. There is no need on your part to "give back" as you didn't take anything in the first place. In your role in asset management you served as a contributing member of society, helping to make the country more prosperous. I appreciate the sentiment, but there is nothing owed on your part.
ReplyDeleteBest,
Colin
Your Blog is a must read for me Scott. Thank you for championing freedom's cause and the free markets that honor human beings. I agree with Colin that you do not need to give back. Giving is it's own reward and you are advocating a good path. Thank you also for using your disability to educate and inspire others.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations and Thank You....
ReplyDeleteCongrats on your well-earned recognition in blog-land. Now, if I could just get you consider what tight money, zero inflation and a strong yen have done to Japan.....
ReplyDeleteDidn't know it's only been two years; i think i started reading you blog about a year and a half ago and am addicted . . . please keep it up Scott, you are a "shining light" as they say!
ReplyDeleteHappy Birthday!
ReplyDeleteAs always, thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts and research. Right or wrong, the posts are always appreciated and read in their entirety.
Armed with knowledge, perhaps the masses won't make the same political mistakes that have been made in the past.
We are now the media.
Thank you Scott. You have been a wonderful teacher.
ReplyDeleteScott,
ReplyDeleteYour blog is first on my list, every single day! You back up your opinions with data, much of which seems to be unavailable anywhere else. Thank you so much!
Regards,
Michael
Scott: Thank you so much for your wise commentary and financial insight. I read your blog daily and always learn something new. Thanks also for being a beacon of light in a dark time.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations Scott, and a job well done. Your blog is on the top of my must visit list.
ReplyDeleteAll the best to you and your family.
Bob
Scott,
ReplyDeleteCongratulations and thank you for all you do. I have found your blog inspiring and educational.
Best Wishes Always
Scott,
ReplyDeleteForgot to mention it, but when an everyday conversation turns to economic matters, I find myself reciting the knowledge I've gained from CBP.
Invariably, I recommend to my friends and colleagues that they read CBP on a daily basis. I'm not sure how many do, but that's truly their loss.
Very grateful for your work and the approach you take to the site. Hands down my vote for best economics blog on the web.
ReplyDeleteI came to your site for the first time (almost a couple years ago I guess) b/c Kudlow had referenced an article you had written here on his page. I believe it was an article about the net risk of the CDS market being misrepresented in the mainstream media (grossly exaggerated and misunderstood, that is). I'd have to say that your thesis on that one looks like it was a pretty good one, as the vast majority of them are. I read the CBP as often as I can, the information is succinct, reliable, and always lucidly reasoned.
Clarify: I'm not sure how many do, but that's truly their loss if they don't.
ReplyDeleteSunday, 7:10am and no coffee.
No doubt many of your readers feel as do that going to your blog is like coming home...a place of blissful respite in a financial world run amok with negativity and dour sentiment. Your relentlessly positive outlook provides a welcome beacon of light guiding our ships safely into the harbor of reason. Congratulations on your anniversary and may you enjoy many more happy global travels!
ReplyDeletecongrats!
ReplyDeleteI do appreciate you sharing your views. This is especially the case given my own bias toward the negative view. I enjoy reading contrary analysis.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I must say your early posts in 2008 were very concerning in their consistent discounting of any bad economic news. You called the bottom on a lot of occasions in jobs, manufacuting, GDP growth, housing activity, etc...and there was plenty of downside to come. This was very similar to Wesbury. How would you say your forecasting method has changed in light of this recession?
Congratulations Scott on your blog anniversary. Thank you very much for taking the time to share your insights about the economy with people like me. I have learned a lot in the past two years since I stumbled upon this blog by accident.
ReplyDeleteI live half a world away, in Indonesia (currently one of the hottest emerging market). Yet every morning, I will log onto your blog. It is a MUST read for me!
Jason and Jen: My optimism in late 2008 proved premature, in a big way. What happened I think was not that my analysis of the fundamentals was wrong, but that I utterly failed to predict how far to the left the Democrats would lurch under the direction of Obama. It think to this day that the drop in the stock market from late 2008 through early March 2009 was almost entirely due to the absolutely shocking fiscal policy which came out of Washington. What it amounted to was a huge, unexpected, massive increase in future tax liabilities.
ReplyDeleteBy late 2008 the market had priced in a severe depression and deflation. Then it had to price in an out-of-control government with many trillions of dollars of deficits, and the higher taxes that would be required to pay for those deficits. It was a "worst-nightmare" scenario. I don't know how to predict those kinds of events. But if you had bought the market then (late 2008) and held on, you would not have been disappointed. That is a key point that I think should be recognized. You can never hope to pick the bottom, and I was mistaken in trying to do so.
Thanks to all for you very kind comments. That gives me the encouragement to continue for another year!
ReplyDeletePlease another year!
ReplyDeleteScott, also pass to Norma our thanks for her support and encouragement, and we hope to see not only good economics, but great travel reporting in the near future! Argentina was a great trip!
While it all remains to be seen, it isn't clear to me that the drop from 1200 to 900 in late '08 was pricing in a severe depression. At 850-900, the S&P was still trading at above average PEs using Shiller's methodology. As you know, the 74 and 82 valuations were half what we saw at that point in late '08.
ReplyDeleteThe fear in early 2009 was likely due to the growing possibility that Obama was not going provide severe regulatory forbearance for the banking system. By March, it decided to do so and the market liked it.
Based on valuations, using more that forward looking estimates, the market could very easily find its way back 850-900. This would not take a severe depression outlook.
In summary, to consider the drop from 1200 in Sept/Oct '08 to 850-900 by late '08 as primarily due to poor policy responses is underestimating what a balance-sheet recession is all about.
This process is long and slow moving and the adjustments for households is done over time through hard decisions and sacrifices that are gut wrenching. Balance sheet realities move like glaciers for households because hope for recovery is so strong.
Scott,
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on the anniversary of the most informative economic blog on the web. Thank you for your diligent work at standing athwart the forces of darkness and saying STOP. Ronald Reagan said "government is the problem" and I say your thoughts on liberty and freedom are the solution.
Many thanks,
Don
Jason and Jen: If you look back, you will see I had a number of posts near the end of 2008 and early 2009 that documented my reasons for believing at the time that the market was priced to something worse than the Depression of the 1930s. Corporate credit spreads were one obvious example—at one point they were predicting that almost half the companies in America were going to be bankrupt within the next 3-5 years.
ReplyDeleteWell done and keep at it if you are still having fun. Your blog is useful, insightful, and interesting!
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot, and good luck to you and your family.
ReplyDeleteEspecially I do appreciate your explanations of long term trends in various assets, it is a very short, but clear lesson of economy.
Thank you for doing this. Your blog is a valuable source of information, and I learn a lot about economics through it. I am not an economist, but I studied some economics (only Keynsian economics was taught). I have since converted to the Austrian school, and I agree that it is under appreciated; partly because it simply is not taught in schools so folks are not very familiar with it.
ReplyDeleteThank you again,
Todd
Congrats! Scott I've been fortunate to be with you from almost the beginning. What a ride, huh? I'm a portfolio manager with a major firm and would like to say your research and insight is spot on. Along with my daily java I enjoy reading your blog and Brian Wesbury's weekly comments. For your readers who are interested in Credit Crisis they may enjoy "This Time is Different" by Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart. This book offers great insight into how this should all end, and yes it will end and end well. Again thanks for all your hard work and best wishes for you and your lovely family. Lets pray our voters and leaders get it right this time.
ReplyDeletePort Man
Scott,
ReplyDeleteCongrats and Kudos.
Keep up the good work.
I appreciate your data driven analysis.
Scott, thanks from Italy! I' ve got your blog in my favorites list
ReplyDelete